{"id":7421,"date":"2019-07-24T09:41:24","date_gmt":"2019-07-24T09:41:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aeemt.com\/web\/?page_id=7421"},"modified":"2019-07-24T09:41:24","modified_gmt":"2019-07-24T09:41:24","slug":"original-1-mdt-vol28-n2-resumen","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/original-1-mdt-vol28-n2-resumen\/","title":{"rendered":"Original 1 MDT VOL28 N2 Resumen"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row rt_row_background_width=\u00bbdefault\u00bb rt_row_style=\u00bbdefault-style\u00bb rt_row_borders=\u00bb\u00bb rt_row_paddings=\u00bbtrue\u00bb rt_bg_effect=\u00bbclassic\u00bb rt_bg_image_repeat=\u00bbrepeat\u00bb rt_bg_size=\u00bbcover\u00bb rt_bg_position=\u00bbright top\u00bb rt_bg_attachment=\u00bbscroll\u00bb rt_bg_video_format=\u00bbself-hosted\u00bb][vc_column rt_wrp_col_paddings=\u00bbfalse\u00bb rt_border_top=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_bottom=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_left=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_right=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_top_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_bottom_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_left_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_right_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_bg_image_repeat=\u00bbrepeat\u00bb rt_bg_size=\u00bbauto auto\u00bb rt_bg_position=\u00bbright top\u00bb rt_bg_attachment=\u00bbscroll\u00bb]<div class=\"rt_heading_wrapper \">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h2 class=\"rt_heading  \" >Comparaci\u00f3n de m\u00e9todos utilizados en la valoraci\u00f3n del riesgo biol\u00f3gico<\/h2>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>[\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row rt_row_background_width=\u00bbdefault\u00bb rt_row_style=\u00bbdefault-style\u00bb rt_row_borders=\u00bb\u00bb rt_row_paddings=\u00bbtrue\u00bb rt_bg_effect=\u00bbclassic\u00bb rt_bg_image_repeat=\u00bbrepeat\u00bb rt_bg_size=\u00bbcover\u00bb rt_bg_position=\u00bbright top\u00bb rt_bg_attachment=\u00bbscroll\u00bb rt_bg_video_format=\u00bbself-hosted\u00bb][vc_column rt_wrp_col_paddings=\u00bbfalse\u00bb rt_border_top=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_bottom=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_left=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_right=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_top_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_bottom_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_left_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_right_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_bg_image_repeat=\u00bbrepeat\u00bb rt_bg_size=\u00bbauto auto\u00bb rt_bg_position=\u00bbright top\u00bb rt_bg_attachment=\u00bbscroll\u00bb][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" id=\"cabecero\" src=\"http:\/\/www.aeemt.com\/Revista_AEEMT_NF\/imagenes\/Revista_AEEMT_Cabecero.png\" alt=\"cabecero_AEEMT\" width=\"934\" height=\"301\" name=\"cabecero\" border=\"0\" \/><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">N\u00famero de la Revista: Vol. 28 &#8211; n\u00ba 02 &#8211;\u00a0junio 2019<\/p>\n<p><strong>Secci\u00f3n:<\/strong> \u00a0Original<br \/>\n<strong>T\u00edtulo:<\/strong>\u00a0 Comparaci\u00f3n de m\u00e9todos utilizados en la valoraci\u00f3n del riesgo biol\u00f3gico.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Autores:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Zaida Roc\u00edo Contreras Vel\u00e1squez(1); Pastor Ramirez Leal(2)<\/strong><\/em><br \/>\n1 Especialista en Epidemiolog\u00eda Cl\u00ednica, Especialista en Pr\u00e1cticas Pedagogicas Universitarias, Magister en Desarrollo Sostenible y Medio Ambiente. Docente catedr\u00e1tico de la Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander. C\u00facuta, Norte de Santander. Colombia<br \/>\n2 Especialista en Estad\u00edstica Aplicada. Magister en Educaci\u00f3n Matem\u00e1tica. Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander. C\u00facuta, Colombia<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Correspondencia:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>Zaida Roc\u00edo Contreras Vel\u00e1squez.<\/strong><\/em><br \/>\nFacultad de Ciencias Agrarias y del Medio Ambiente.<br \/>\nAvenida Gran Colombia No 12E-96 Barrio Colsag.<br \/>\nCorreo: <a href=\"mailto:zaidarociocv@ufps.edu.co\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">zaidarociocv@ufps.edu.co<\/a><br \/>\nC\u00f3digo Postal: 540003<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Palabras Clave<\/strong>: riesgo biologico, bioseguridad, salud ocupacional.<br \/>\n<strong>Keywords<\/strong>: biological risk, biosecurity, occupational health.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Cita Art\u00edculo<\/strong>:\u00a0 Z R Contreras et al. Comparaci\u00f3n de m\u00e9todos utilizados en la valoraci\u00f3n del riesgo biol\u00f3gico. Rev Asoc Esp Espec Med Trab 2019; 28: 91-108.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Acceso al PDF: <div class=\"button_wrapper \"><a  href=\"http:\/\/www.aeemt.com\/Revista_AEEMT_NF\/VOL_28_N02_2019_JUN\/NO%20SOCIOS\/ORIGINAL%201%20VOL28%20N2%20NO%20SOCIOS.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Comparaci\u00f3n de m\u00e9todos utilizados en la valoraci\u00f3n del riesgo biol\u00f3gico.\" class=\"button_  default medium\"><strong>PDF del Resumen<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Resumen:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Objetivo:<\/strong> comparar la evaluaci\u00f3n del nivel del riesgo biol\u00f3gico de los m\u00e9todos Biogaval y GTC 45.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>M\u00e9todos:<\/strong> estudio descriptivo observacional de corte transversal aplicado a una muestra de 24 laboratorios. Se aplic\u00f3 analisis correlacional de puntuaciones t\u00edpicas.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Resultados:<\/strong> el 95% (n=23) de los laboratorios en L\u00edmite de Acci\u00f3n Biol\u00f3gica y el 4,2% (n=1) en Nivel de Acci\u00f3n Biol\u00f3gica, seg\u00fan Biogaval; y el 41,6% (n=10) en situaci\u00f3n cr\u00edtica y el 58,3% (n=14) de los laboratorios debe adoptar medidas de control inmediato, seg\u00fan GTC-45. Se encontr\u00f3 correlaci\u00f3n positiva perfecta (Rho=1.00) en las variables cumplimiento de medidas higi\u00e9nicas\/nivel de deficiencia, as\u00ed como nivel de exposici\u00f3n\/frecuencia de realizaci\u00f3n de tareas; muy al contrario, la determinaci\u00f3n del nivel de incidencia\/nivel de probabilidad no presentaron una correlaci\u00f3n significativa (Rho=0.103). No existe una correlaci\u00f3n significativa (Rho=0.468) entre el m\u00e9todo\u00a0Biogaval y el m\u00e9todo GTC 45. Discusi\u00f3n: se hace necesario proponer un m\u00e9todo dirigido hacia los microorganismos a riesgo y acorde con la normatividad colombiana.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Title:\u00a0 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF METHODS FOR THE VALORATION OF BIOLOGICAL RISK<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Abstract:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Objective:<\/strong> to compare the evaluation of the biological risk level of the Biogaval and GTC 45 methods.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Methods:<\/strong> an observational cross-sectional descriptive study applied to a sample of 24 laboratories. Correlation analysis of typical scores was applied.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Results:<\/strong> 95% (n = 23) of the laboratories in Biological Action Limit and 4.2% (n = 1) in the Biological Action Level, according to Biogaval; and 41.6% (n = 10) in a critical situation and 58.3% (n = 14) of the laboratories must adopt immediate control measures, according to GTC-45. We found a perfect positive correlation (Rho = 1.00) in the variables compliance with hygienic measures \/ level of deficiency, as well as level of exposure \/ frequency of completion of tasks; On the contrary, the determination of the level of incidence \/ level of probability did not\u00a0show a significant correlation (Rho = 0.103). There is no significant correlation (Rho = 0.468) between the Biogaval method and the GTC 45 method. Discussion: it is necessary to propose a method aimed at microorganisms at risk and in accordance with Colombian regulations.<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row rt_row_background_width=\u00bbdefault\u00bb rt_row_style=\u00bbdefault-style\u00bb rt_row_borders=\u00bb\u00bb rt_row_paddings=\u00bbtrue\u00bb rt_bg_effect=\u00bbclassic\u00bb rt_bg_image_repeat=\u00bbrepeat\u00bb rt_bg_size=\u00bbcover\u00bb rt_bg_position=\u00bbright top\u00bb rt_bg_attachment=\u00bbscroll\u00bb rt_bg_video_format=\u00bbself-hosted\u00bb][vc_column rt_wrp_col_paddings=\u00bbfalse\u00bb rt_border_top=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_bottom=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_left=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_right=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_top_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_bottom_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_left_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_right_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_bg_image_repeat=\u00bbrepeat\u00bb rt_bg_size=\u00bbauto auto\u00bb rt_bg_position=\u00bbright top\u00bb rt_bg_attachment=\u00bbscroll\u00bb][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row rt_row_background_width=\u00bbdefault\u00bb rt_row_style=\u00bbdefault-style\u00bb rt_row_borders=\u00bb\u00bb [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-7421","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7421"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7421"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7421\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7421"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}