PDF del Art\u00edculo<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\nRESUMEN.<\/strong><\/p>\nObjetivos:<\/strong> Comparar el cambio del nivel de riesgo ergon\u00f3mico en posturas forzadas y movimiento repetitivo por redise\u00f1o de puesto de m\u00e1quina sopladora de botellas de pl\u00e1stico en una f\u00e1brica en la ciudad de Lima.<\/p>\nMaterial y M\u00e9todo:<\/strong> Las metodolog\u00edas empleadas para posturas de trabajo y de movimiento repetitivo fueron las normas ISO 11226:2000 y OCRA Checklist respectivamente.<\/p>\nResultados:<\/strong> Los niveles de riesgo de los trabajadores en la primera evaluaci\u00f3n de OCRA Checklist para movimientos repetitivos dieron niveles de \u201criesgo medio\u201d y \u201criesgo elevado\u201d y para posturas forzadas evaluado mediante ISO 11226:2000 se encontraba en nivel \u201cno recomendado\u201d. Luego del redise\u00f1o ergon\u00f3mico se obtuvo el nivel \u201criesgo aceptable\u201d.<\/p>\nConclusi\u00f3n:<\/strong> En el proceso de abastecimiento de botellas de m\u00e1quinas sopladoras, inicialmente no presentaban criterios ergon\u00f3micos\u00a0aceptables para los peligros de movimiento repetitivo y posturas de trabajo. No obstante, al realizar el redise\u00f1o del puesto de trabajo se obtuvo niveles de riesgos \u201caceptables\u201d.<\/p>\nTitle:\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\nCHANGING THE LEVEL OF ERGONOMIC RISK IN FORCED POSTURES AND REPETITIVE MOVEMENT BY REDESIGNING THE BLOWING MACHINE FOR PLASTIC BOTTLES<\/strong><\/p>\nAbstract:<\/strong><\/p>\nObjective:<\/strong> To compare the change in the level of ergonomic risk in forced postures and repetitive movement due to the redesign of the job of a plastic bottle blowing machine in a factory in the city of Lima.<\/p>\nMaterial and Methods:<\/strong> The methodologies used for work postures and repetitive movement were the ISO 11226:2000 and OCRA Checklist standards, respectively.<\/p>\nResults:<\/strong> The risk levels of the workers in the first evaluation of OCRA Checklist for repetitive movements gave levels of \u201cmedium risk\u201d and \u201chigh risk\u201d and for forced postures evaluated by ISO 11226:2000 it was at the \u201cnot recommended\u201d level. After the ergonomic redesign, the \u201cacceptable risk\u201d level was obtained.<\/p>\nConclusion:<\/strong> In the bottle supply process for blow molding machines, initially they did not present acceptable ergonomic criteria for the dangers of repetitive movement and work postures. However, when carrying out the redesign of the workplace, \u201cacceptable\u201d risk levels were obtained.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[vc_row rt_row_background_width=\u00bbdefault\u00bb rt_row_style=\u00bbdefault-style\u00bb rt_row_borders=\u00bb\u00bb rt_row_paddings=\u00bbtrue\u00bb rt_bg_effect=\u00bbclassic\u00bb rt_bg_image_repeat=\u00bbrepeat\u00bb rt_bg_size=\u00bbcover\u00bb rt_bg_position=\u00bbright top\u00bb rt_bg_attachment=\u00bbscroll\u00bb rt_bg_video_format=\u00bbself-hosted\u00bb][vc_column rt_wrp_col_paddings=\u00bbfalse\u00bb rt_border_top=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_bottom=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_left=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_right=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_top_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_bottom_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_left_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_right_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_bg_image_repeat=\u00bbrepeat\u00bb rt_bg_size=\u00bbauto auto\u00bb rt_bg_position=\u00bbright top\u00bb rt_bg_attachment=\u00bbscroll\u00bb][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row rt_row_background_width=\u00bbdefault\u00bb rt_row_style=\u00bbdefault-style\u00bb rt_row_borders=\u00bb\u00bb […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-68367","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/68367"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68367"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/68367\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68367"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"cabecero_AEEMT\"](\"http:\/\/www.aeemt.com\/Revista_AEEMT_NF\/imagenes\/Revista_AEEMT_Cabecero.png\")
<\/h3>\n