PDF del Resumen<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\nRESUMEN.<\/strong><\/p>\nIntroducci\u00f3n:<\/strong> Los estudios de normatividad comparada se usan como una metodolog\u00eda de an\u00e1lisis jur\u00eddico basada en la comparaci\u00f3n de las distintas aplicaciones e interpretaciones para casos similares, el inter\u00e9s en el derecho comparado radica en que nutre y\u00a0 ampliar la visi\u00f3n para el entendimiento internacional, que nos hace comprender la raz\u00f3n de ser de las normas en los distintos estados, de nuestro inter\u00e9s el concepto del ciudadano andino y el Estatuto migratorio que define que los migrantes trabajadores de Bolivia Colombia Per\u00fa y Ecuador tienen derechos, garant\u00edas y deberes adicionales a los de su pa\u00eds de nacimiento, estos nuevos derechos sociales son los otorgados desde el 11 de agosto 2021 mediante la decisi\u00f3n 878 estatuto migratorio andino. Al analizar si los trabajadores de salud que atendieron el COVID-19, se les considero en cada uno de sus pa\u00edses la exposici\u00f3n a riesgo ocupacional tipo biol\u00f3gico como de origen laboral, ya que el objetivo de la comunidad es estandarizar y\u00a0normalizar conceptos y normativas y as\u00ed permitir inferir si se tiene\u00a0derecho a las prestaciones asistenciales y econ\u00f3micas objeto de cobertura al trabajador. Enfermedad Laboral en los trabajadores de la salud que atendieron la Pandemia.<\/p>\nObjetivo:<\/strong> Comparar la legislaci\u00f3n emitida por las autoridades sanitarias de los pa\u00edses miembros de la Comunidad Andina de Naciones sobre el COVID-19, y si esta se configur\u00f3 como una Enfermedad Profesional en los trabajadores de la salud que atendieron la Pandemia.<\/p>\nMaterial y M\u00e9todo:<\/strong> Se realiz\u00f3 una revisi\u00f3n exhaustiva en los canales oficiales de comunicaci\u00f3n de la autoridad sanitaria de Colombia, Ecuador, Per\u00fa y Bolivia pa\u00edses miembros de la CAN, filtrando la informaci\u00f3n sobre c\u00f3mo desarrollaron en sus normativas internas el COVID-19 como Enfermedad Laboral, identificando garant\u00edas y protecciones que brindan los Pa\u00edses a los Trabajadores de la Salud que se han encargado de la atenci\u00f3n integral de esta contingencia. Estudio descriptivo que incluyo b\u00fasqueda entre abril a diciembre del 2021.<\/p>\nResultado:<\/strong> Posterior a la revisi\u00f3n, se reconoci\u00f3 el COVID-19 como Enfermedad Laboral en trabajadores de la salud, en 3 de los 4 Pa\u00edses, 1 de los Pa\u00edses lo determino como un problema de Salud P\u00fablica, as\u00ed mismo se encontr\u00f3 que cada Pa\u00eds, aborda de manera diferente los Riesgos Laborales, traduci\u00e9ndose en que los Trabajadores de la Salud de la CAN, no tuvieron garant\u00edas y protecciones propias del sistema de Riesgos Laborales.<\/p>\nConclusiones:<\/strong> Falta desarrollo por parte de todos los Pa\u00edses que componen la CAN, frente a alinear su normatividad en materia de riesgos laborales, de tal forma que garanticen el acceso al Ciudadano Andino a gozar de las garant\u00edas que brinda la seguridad social de acuerdo a la norma supra nacional, Decisi\u00f3n 584 que aprueba un instrumento que establece las normas fundamentales en materia de seguridad y salud en el trabajo, como base para la gradual y progresiva armonizaci\u00f3n de las leyes y los reglamentos que regulen las situaciones particulares de las actividades laborales que se desarrollan en cada uno de los Pa\u00edses Miembros, quienes no est\u00e1n desarrollado completamente por todos los pa\u00edses miembros, lo que generara una inseguridad jur\u00eddica y una incertidumbre en el trabajador migrante.<\/p>\nTitle:\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\nCOVID-19 AS AN OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE IN HEALTH PERSONNEL OF THE MEMBER COUNTRIES OF THE ANDEAN COMMUNITY OF NATIONS. A STUDY OF COMPARATIVE REGULATIONS<\/strong><\/p>\nAbstract:<\/strong><\/p>\nIntroduction:<\/strong> The studies of comparative law are used as a methodology of legal analysis based on the comparison of different applications and interpretations for similar cases, the interest in comparative law lies in that it nourishes and broadens the vision for international understanding, which makes us understand the rationale of the rules in different states, Of our interest is the concept of the Andean citizen and the migratory statute that defines that migrant workers from Bolivia, Colombia, Peru and Ecuador have\u00a0additional rights, guarantees and duties to those of their country of birth, these new social rights are those granted since August 11, 2021 by decision 878 of the Andean migratory statute. When analyzing whether the health workers who attended the COVID-19, exposure to occupational biological risk was considered in each of their countries as of occupational origin, since the objective of the community is to standardize and normalize concepts and regulations and thus allow inferring whether they are entitled to the assistance and economic benefits covered to the worker<\/p>\nObjective:<\/strong> To compare the legislation issued by the health authorities of the member countries of the Andean Community of Nations on COVID-19, and if this was configured as an Occupational Disease in health workers who attended the Pandemic.<\/p>\nMaterial and Method:<\/strong> An exhaustive review\u00a0 was\u00a0 carried\u00a0 out\u00a0 in\u00a0 the\u00a0 official\u00a0 communication\u00a0 channels\u00a0 of\u00a0 the\u00a0 health\u00a0 authorities\u00a0 of Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia, CAN member countries, filtering the information on\u00a0 how\u00a0 they\u00a0 developed\u00a0 COVID-19\u00a0 as an Occupational Disease in their internal regulations, identifying guarantees and protections provided by the countries to the health workers who have been in charge of the integral attention of this contingency. Descriptive study that included a search from April to December 2021.<\/p>\nResults:<\/strong> After the review,COVID-19 was recognized as an Occupational Disease in health workers, in 3 of the 4 Countries, 1 of the Countries determined it as a Public Health problem, likewise it was found that each Country, approaches Occupational Risks differently, translating into the fact that Health Workers of the CAN, did not have guarantees and protections proper to the Occupational Risks system.<\/p>\nConclusions:<\/strong> There is a lack of development on the part of all the Countries that make up the CAN, with regard to aligning their regulations on labor risks, in such a way that they guarantee access to the Andean Citizen to enjoy the guarantees provided by social security in accordance with the supra-national regulation, Decision 584 which approves an instrument that establishes the fundamental rules on occupational safety and health, as a basis for the gradual and progressive harmonization of the laws and regulations governing the particular situations of the labor activities developed in each of the Member Countries, which are not fully developed by all the member countries, generating legal insecurity and uncertainty for the migrant worker.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[vc_row rt_row_background_width=\u00bbdefault\u00bb rt_row_style=\u00bbdefault-style\u00bb rt_row_borders=\u00bb\u00bb rt_row_paddings=\u00bbtrue\u00bb rt_bg_effect=\u00bbclassic\u00bb rt_bg_image_repeat=\u00bbrepeat\u00bb rt_bg_size=\u00bbcover\u00bb rt_bg_position=\u00bbright top\u00bb rt_bg_attachment=\u00bbscroll\u00bb rt_bg_video_format=\u00bbself-hosted\u00bb][vc_column rt_wrp_col_paddings=\u00bbfalse\u00bb rt_border_top=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_bottom=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_left=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_right=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_top_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_bottom_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_left_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_right_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_bg_image_repeat=\u00bbrepeat\u00bb rt_bg_size=\u00bbauto auto\u00bb rt_bg_position=\u00bbright top\u00bb rt_bg_attachment=\u00bbscroll\u00bb][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row rt_row_background_width=\u00bbdefault\u00bb rt_row_style=\u00bbdefault-style\u00bb rt_row_borders=\u00bb\u00bb […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-67620","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/67620"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67620"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/67620\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67620"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"cabecero_AEEMT\"](\"http:\/\/www.aeemt.com\/Revista_AEEMT_NF\/imagenes\/Revista_AEEMT_Cabecero.png\")
<\/h3>\n