PDF del Resumen<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\nRESUMEN.<\/strong><\/p>\nIntroducci\u00f3n:<\/strong> La lumbalgia sigue siendo uno de los principales s\u00edntomas en el personal de salud que asiste y traslada pacientes, sobre todo con el incremento de casos durante la pandemia de la COVID-19.<\/p>\nObjetivo:<\/strong> Determinar los factores socio-laborales asociados a la lumbalgia en t\u00e9cnicas y enfermeras de servicios cr\u00edticos que atendieron pacientes COVID-19.<\/p>\nMaterial y M\u00e9todos:<\/strong> Estudio transversal anal\u00edtico. A trav\u00e9s de una encuesta virtual se recolect\u00f3 informaci\u00f3n del personal de enfermer\u00eda de los servicios de UCI general, UCI COVID-19 y Traumatolog\u00eda de un hospital del Seguro Social en Lima-Per\u00fa. La variable principal fue la lumbalgia, esta se cruz\u00f3 con otras variables de inter\u00e9s mediante estad\u00edstica descriptiva y anal\u00edtica.<\/p>\nResultados:<\/strong> De las 265 respuestas, el 62% (165) manifest\u00f3 tener un dolor lumbar. En el modelo multivariado, se encontr\u00f3 que hubo mayor padecimiento de lumbalgia seg\u00fan el tener m\u00e1s a\u00f1os de trabajo (RPa: 1,03; IC95%: 1,01-1,06; valor p=0,008) y si antes hab\u00edan tenido una incapacidad laboral (RPa: 1,45; IC95%: 1,25-1,68; valor p<0,001), en cambio, a mayor edad de las encuestadas hubo menos lumbalgia (RPa: 0,97; IC95%: 0,95-0,99; valor p=0,013), ajustado por cinco variables.<\/p>\nDiscusi\u00f3n:<\/strong> La mayor\u00eda de encuestadas tuvo lumbalgia, estando asociado a m\u00e1s a\u00f1os de trabajo, haber tenido previamente una incapacidad laboral y a la edad. Esta situaci\u00f3n puede que se est\u00e9 repitiendo en poblaciones similares, por lo que, los servicios de salud ocupacional deber\u00e1n realizar evaluaciones e intervenciones para mejorar esta realidad.<\/p>\nTitle:\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\nSOCIO-OCCUPATIONAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH LOW BACK PAIN IN TECHNICIANS AND NURSES WHO ATTENDED COVID-19 PATIENTS IN PERU<\/strong><\/p>\nAbstract:<\/strong><\/p>\nIntroduction:<\/strong> Low back pain continues to be one of the main symptoms in personnel carrying out loads, but this was not widely investigated in the context of COVID-19.<\/p>\nObjective:<\/strong> To determine the socio-occupational factors associated with low back pain in technicians and nurses of critical medical services who treated COVID-19 patients.<\/p>\nMaterial and Methodos:<\/strong> Cross-sectional analytical study. Through a virtual survey, information was collected from the nursing staff of the general ICU, COVID-19 ICU and Traumatology services of a Social Security hospital in Lima-Peru. The main variable was low back pain, this was crossed with other variables of interest through\u00a0descriptive and analytical statistics.<\/p>\nResults:<\/strong> Of the 265 responses, 62% (165) reported having low back pain. In the multivariate model, it was found that there was a greater suffering from low back pain according to having more years of work (RPa: 1,03; CI: 95%: 1,01-1,06; p-value=0,008) and if they had previously had a work disability (RPa: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.25-1.68; p-value=<0.001), on the other hand, the older the respondents, the less low back pain (RPa: 0.97; CI95%: 0.95-0.99; p value=0.0013), adjusted for five variables.<\/p>\nDiscussion:<\/strong> The majority of respondents had low back pain, being associated with more years of work, having previously had a work disability and age. This situation may be repeating itself in similar populations, so occupational health services should carry out evaluations and interventions to improve this reality. Keywords: Low back pain; occupational health; nurses; Peru.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[vc_row rt_row_background_width=\u00bbdefault\u00bb rt_row_style=\u00bbdefault-style\u00bb rt_row_borders=\u00bb\u00bb rt_row_paddings=\u00bbtrue\u00bb rt_bg_effect=\u00bbclassic\u00bb rt_bg_image_repeat=\u00bbrepeat\u00bb rt_bg_size=\u00bbcover\u00bb rt_bg_position=\u00bbright top\u00bb rt_bg_attachment=\u00bbscroll\u00bb rt_bg_video_format=\u00bbself-hosted\u00bb][vc_column rt_wrp_col_paddings=\u00bbfalse\u00bb rt_border_top=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_bottom=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_left=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_right=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_top_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_bottom_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_left_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_right_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_bg_image_repeat=\u00bbrepeat\u00bb rt_bg_size=\u00bbauto auto\u00bb rt_bg_position=\u00bbright top\u00bb rt_bg_attachment=\u00bbscroll\u00bb][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row rt_row_background_width=\u00bbdefault\u00bb rt_row_style=\u00bbdefault-style\u00bb rt_row_borders=\u00bb\u00bb […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-67210","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/67210"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67210"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/67210\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67210"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"cabecero_AEEMT\"](\"http:\/\/www.aeemt.com\/Revista_AEEMT_NF\/imagenes\/Revista_AEEMT_Cabecero.png\")
<\/h3>\n