Resumen:<\/strong><\/p>\nLa literatura especializada coincide en se\u00f1alar que los procesos de reestructuraci\u00f3n empresarial, sobre todo los que conllevan reducciones de personal, provocan un empeoramiento de los factores psicosociales y est\u00e1n relacionados con la inseguridad laboral afectando de forma negativa el bienestar de los trabajadores.
\nEl estudio PREISAP tiene como objetivo medir el impacto de los factores de riesgo psicosocial alterados sobre el nivel de salud mental percibida, tras las reestructuraciones sufridas por dos empresas espa\u00f1olas en el periodo 2007-2014.
\nSe analizan los datos recogidos de los reconocimientos m\u00e9dicos de 444 empleados, aplicando el protocolo PSICOVS2012. Se evalu\u00f3 el \u00edndice de riesgo psicosocial (IFRP-Q) y se consider\u00f3 la presencia de acontecimientos traum\u00e1ticos. Para medir el grado de bienestar laboral,\u00a0se consider\u00f3 el nivel de Salud Mental (GHQ12), la Salud Percibida (SF36), el nivel de Estr\u00e9s (FOIH), el \u00edndice General de Malestar (IGM) y la Suspicacia Paranoide (IFC).
\nSe estudia la asociaci\u00f3n entre las caracter\u00edsticas personales\/laborales y tipo de reestructuraci\u00f3n con el \u00edndice de bienestar, indicando los valores p de cada prueba, empleando el Coeficiente de Correlaci\u00f3n de Pearson, la t de Student y Anova. Para el an\u00e1lisis multivariable se calcularon las Odd Ratio (IC 95%).
\nLos resultados muestran valores alterados de los factores psicosociales seg\u00fan el tipo de reestructuraci\u00f3n, un empeoramiento de la salud general y la salud mental, mayores niveles de estr\u00e9s e IGM; con diferencias significativas seg\u00fan g\u00e9nero, edad y ocupaci\u00f3n.
\nEstos datos coinciden con lo se\u00f1alado en la bibliograf\u00eda, lo que sugiere la necesidad de actuar a nivel preventivo para promover procesos de cambio saludable.<\/p>\n
Title:<\/strong>
\nCORPORATE RESTRUCTURING PROCESSES AND THEIR IMPACT ON PSYCHOPHYSICAL HEALTH IN A WORKING POPULATION: \u201cPREISAP STUDY\u201d<\/p>\nAbstract:<\/strong><\/p>\nThe specialized literature agrees that business restructuring processes, especially those involving staff reductions, lead to a worsening of psychosocial factors and are related to job insecurity, negatively affecting the welfare of workers.
\nThe PREISAP study aims to measure the impact of altered psychosocial risk factors on the level of perceived mental health, following the restructurings suffered by two Spanish companies in the period 2007-2014.
\nData collected from the medical examinations of 444 employees are analyzed using the PSICOVS2012 protocol.
\nThe psychosocial risk index (IFRP-Q) was evaluated and the presence of\u00a0traumatic events was considered. The level of Mental Health (GHQ12), Perceived Health (SF36), Stress Level (FOIH), General Discomfort Index (IGM) and Paranoid Suspicion (IFC) were considered.
\nThe association between the personal \/ work characteristics and the type of restructuring with the welfare index is studied, indicating the p-values of each test, using Pearson\u2019s Correlation Coefficient, Student\u2019s t and Anova. Odd Ratio (95% CI) was calculated for the multivariable analysis.
\nThe results show altered values of psychosocial factors according to the type of restructuring, a worsening of general health and mental health, higher levels of stress and IGM; With significant differences according to gender, age and occupation.
\nThese data coincide with what is indicated in the literature, suggesting the need to\u00a0act at a preventive level to promote healthy change processes.<\/p>\n
[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[vc_row rt_row_background_width=\u00bbdefault\u00bb rt_row_style=\u00bbdefault-style\u00bb rt_row_borders=\u00bb\u00bb rt_row_paddings=\u00bbtrue\u00bb rt_bg_effect=\u00bbclassic\u00bb rt_bg_image_repeat=\u00bbrepeat\u00bb rt_bg_size=\u00bbcover\u00bb rt_bg_position=\u00bbright top\u00bb rt_bg_attachment=\u00bbscroll\u00bb rt_bg_video_format=\u00bbself-hosted\u00bb][vc_column rt_wrp_col_paddings=\u00bbfalse\u00bb rt_border_top=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_bottom=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_left=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_right=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_top_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_bottom_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_left_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_border_right_mobile=\u00bb\u00bb rt_bg_image_repeat=\u00bbrepeat\u00bb rt_bg_size=\u00bbauto auto\u00bb rt_bg_position=\u00bbright top\u00bb rt_bg_attachment=\u00bbscroll\u00bb][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row rt_row_background_width=\u00bbdefault\u00bb rt_row_style=\u00bbdefault-style\u00bb rt_row_borders=\u00bb\u00bb […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4070","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4070"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4070"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4070\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aeemt.org\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4070"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"cabecero_AEEMT\"](\"http:\/\/www.aeemt.com\/Revista_AEEMT_NF\/imagenes\/Revista_AEEMT_Cabecero.png\")
<\/h3>\n